Postgraduate Module Descriptor


ANTM103: Applied Anthrozoology

This module descriptor refers to the 2017/8 academic year.

How this Module is Assessed

In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.

Formative Assessment

A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.

Form of assessmentSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Non-assessed exercisesWeekly Q&A discussions and reflexive exercises on VLE discussion forums (equivalent to 2 hours or 750 words per week)1, 2, 3, 5Peer-assessed (via postings on ELE and/or The Den (Anthrozoology group on Exeter's social networking site) and written feedback on the discussion forums.
Fieldwork diaryApproximately 2,500 words2, 5, 6Peer-assessed (via postings on ELE and/or The Den (Anthrozoology group on Exeter's social networking site) and written feedback on the discussion forums.

Summative Assessment

A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.

CourseworkWritten examsPractical exams
80020

...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.

Form of assessment% of creditSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Reflexive journal203,000 words2, 5, 6Written
Individual presentation2020 minutes 1, 2, 4, 6, 7Written and verbal
Research report604,000 words1, 2, 4, 6, 7Written
0
0
0

Re-assessment

Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.

Original form of assessmentForm of re-assessmentILOs re-assessedTimescale for re-assessment
Reflexive journalReflexive journal (3,000 words)2, 5, 6August/September re-assessment period
PresentationPresentation (20 minutes)1, 2, 4, 6, 7August/September re-assessment period
Research reportResearch report (4,000 words)1, 2, 4, 6, 7August/September re-assessment period

Indicative Reading List

This reading list is indicative - i.e. it provides an idea of texts that may be useful to you on this module, but it is not considered to be a confirmed or compulsory reading list for this module.

Basic reading:

Appiah, K.A. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

Birke, L. 2009. Naming names – or, what’s in it for the animals? Humanimalia 1(1): n.p.

Hastrup, K. and Elsass, P. 1990. Anthropological advocacy: a contradiction in terms? Current Anthropology 31(3): 301–311.

Kellett, P. 2009. Advocacy in anthropology: active engagement or passive scholarship? Durham Anthropology Journal 16(1): 22–31.

Layton, R. 1996. Advocacy is a personal commitment for anthropologists, not an institutional imperative for anthropology. In: P. Wade (ed.) Advocacy in anthropology. GDAT Debate No. 7.Manchester:ManchesterUniversity Press.

Nadasdy, P. 2003. Hunters and bureaucrats: power, knowledge, and aboriginal–state relations in the southwest Yukon. Vancouver:University ofBritish Columbia Press.

Petto, A.J. and Russell, K.D. 1998. Practicing anthropology on the frontiers of humanity: interspecies applied anthropology. Practicing Anthropology 20(2):

26–29.

Rapport, N. 2007. An outline for cosmopolitan study, for reclaiming the human through introspection. Current Anthropology 48: 257–283.

Theodossopoulos, D. 2005. Troubles with turtles: cultural understandings of the environment on a Greek island. Oxford: Berghahn Books.