Postgraduate Module Descriptor


SOCM031: Evidence-Based Policing

This module descriptor refers to the 2019/0 academic year.

Module Aims

This module aims to provide you with introductory knowledge of evidence-based policing. It aims to teach you how to use police data to create research projects and answer relevant questions for the police. 

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)

This module's assessment will evaluate your achievement of the ILOs listed here - you will see reference to these ILO numbers in the details of the assessment for this module.

On successfully completing the programme you will be able to:
Module-Specific Skills1. Demonstrate detailed knowledge of evidence-based policing;
2. Critically assess the application of research in practice;
3. Show a comprehensive ability to apply research methods and data analysis skills to answer research questions;
Discipline-Specific Skills4. Independently conduct analysis of quantitative data;
5. Demonstrate a critical and in-depth understanding of policing research and the implications for relevant policy;
6. Critically and systematically assess strengths and weaknesses of quantitative research designs in social sciences;
Personal and Key Skills7. Present an argument orally in a clear, organized and effective manner;
8. Effectively communicate results of research in written form to the deadline;
9. Work in a group within a limited time frame to complete a specified task.

How this Module is Assessed

In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.

Formative Assessment

A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.

Form of assessmentSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
ELE testPractice ELE test (20 minutes)1, 2, 3, 5ELE feedback
Participation in seminarsActive participation based on readings1-7, 9Verbal

Summative Assessment

A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.

CourseworkWritten examsPractical exams
75025

...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.

Form of assessment% of creditSize of the assessment (eg length / duration)ILOs assessedFeedback method
Group presentations2520 minute presentations 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9Verbal class feedback
Essay753,000 words1- 8Written

Re-assessment

Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.

Original form of assessmentForm of re-assessmentILOs re-assessedTimescale for re-assessment
Group PresentationsIndividual Presentation (10 minute individual presentations to the lecturer)1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9TBA with students
EssayEssay(3,000 words)1-8August/September reassessment period

Indicative Reading List

This reading list is indicative - i.e. it provides an idea of texts that may be useful to you on this module, but it is not considered to be a confirmed or compulsory reading list for this module.

Basic reading:

 

Ferguson, A.G. (2017). The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement

 

Knutsson, J., and Tompson, L. (2017). Advances in Evidence-Based Policing

 

Lum, C., and Koper, C.S. (2017). Evidence-Based Policing: Translating Research into Practice.

 

Sherman, L.W. (2013). The Rise of Evidence-Based Policing: Targeting, Testing, and Tracking. Crime and Justice 42(1): 377-451.

 

Weisburd, D., Farrington, D.P., and Gill, C. (2016). What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: Lessons from Systematic Reviews