Module LAWM137H for 2021/2
- Overview
- Aims and Learning Outcomes
- Module Content
- Indicative Reading List
- Assessment
Postgraduate Module Descriptor
LAWM137H: Law Research Paper
This module descriptor refers to the 2021/2 academic year.
Module Aims
The aim of this module is to help you pursue, under the guidance of an academic supervisor, an individual programme of research on a topic within the scope of a named degree programme, approved by the programme director, applying appropriate research methodologies and drawing on appropriate materials. The module seeks to encourage and inspire you to engage in deep and critical engagement with legal research and scholarship and the production of an original, substantial and significant contribution to legal knowledge.
By taking this module, you will have the opportunity to develop a detailed knowledge of the law in your chosen research area, together with the skills and methodological tools to analyse, categorise and criticise the law in an extended formal piece of legal writing. You will also have the opportunity to gain a clear understanding of the role of research in legal education, as well as in developing the law in the UK and other countries.
On successfully completing the programme you will be able to: | |
---|---|
Module-Specific Skills | 1. Demonstrate deep and systematic knowledge and understanding of the law applicable to the project that you will have selected and constructed, using research skills and building on prior legal knowledge acquired in the taught part of the programme; 2. Undertake complex critical evaluation of the main legal rules, institutions and procedure relevant to the specific area of law chosen for study in the dissertation, using specialist literature and current research going beyond the knowledge acquired in the taught part of the programme; |
Discipline-Specific Skills | 3. Demonstrate detailed and comprehensive knowledge and understanding of a range of legal concepts, values, principles, institutions and procedures, and the ability to evaluate systematically the relationships among them, as well as their limits; 4. Show clear evidence of virtually autonomous research underpinning self-directed learning by selecting, integrating, evaluating and presenting relevant law and complex legal/theoretical arguments, clearly, autonomously and competently, in writing; 5. Demonstrate flexible and innovative ability to analyse complex legal problems, identify the relative significance of applicable rules and principles, and select appropriate methods for investigating and critically evaluating them; |
Personal and Key Skills | 6. Manage relevant learning resources/ information/ learning strategies confidently and independently, and develop your own arguments and opinions at a very high/ professional level; 7. Communicate and engage in written debate effectively, confidently and autonomously, in a manner appropriate to the discipline; 8. Clarify, plan and undertake tasks confidently and independently, reflect critically on the learning process and make use of feedback effectively. |
Module Content
Syllabus Plan
Although the precise content and delivery of the module may vary, it is anticipated that the syllabus will include the following elements in the order indicated:
1x 2 hour lecture covering the following topics:
Design and structure of a dissertation
Methodology and skills
Good academic practice
In addition, all students will have three individual research meetings with their appointed supervisor, and overall 8 hours of their time. Although the precise content of such meetings will vary according to the particular needs of each individual student, it is expected that the meetings will cover three important steps towards a successful dissertation (see below for details). In addition, the students can of course liaise with their supervisors for ad hoc advice as and when required.
Learning and Teaching
This table provides an overview of how your hours of study for this module are allocated:
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
---|---|---|
5 | 295 | 0 |
...and this table provides a more detailed breakdown of the hours allocated to various study activities:
Category | Hours of study time | Description |
---|---|---|
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | 2 | One lecture of two hours on methodology, design and structure of a dissertation, and good academic practice |
Research meetings | 3 | It is expected that the meetings should each last about one hour. Each meeting is designed to guide the students on 3 important steps to a successful dissertation: 1. Devising adequate research question(s), 2. Refining a structure and 3. Feedback on a sample chapter for advice on academic writing skills |
Guided independent study | 295 | Independent study, with supervisors help as and when needed, up to a further 5 hours of the supervisors time (beyond the three meetings). Such hours will be spent in order to carry out the necessary research as well as the writing up of the dissertation, a symbiotic process, with the guidance of the supervisor. Although the precise organisation of the work will differ for each student, it is expected that a student should spend 50 hours on devising the research question, 50 hours on refining the structure, and the rest divided equally among reading/analysing the material and writing up the dissertation. |
Online Resources
This module has online resources available via ELE (the Exeter Learning Environment).
How this Module is Assessed
In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.
Formative Assessment
A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Comments and discussion of progress with supervisor | 1-8 | Students will have 3 meetings with supervisors, during which, they will receive oral and written comments on the task submitted for the meeting. During each meeting, the student and the supervisor will agree on the next task to be undertaken. Written comments on a sample chapter of the dissertation will be given |
Summative Assessment
A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
100 | 0 | 0 |
...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dissertation | 100 | 7,500 words | 1-8 | Written feedback, with oral comments available at meetings |
Re-assessment
Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Dissertation | Dissertation (7,500 words) | 1-8 | Resubmission by early January |
Indicative Reading List
This reading list is indicative - i.e. it provides an idea of texts that may be useful to you on this module, but it is not considered to be a confirmed or compulsory reading list for this module.
Booth, Colomb and Williams, The Craft of Research (University of Chicago Press 2008)
Knowles, J & Thomas, P, Effective Legal Research (3 rd ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2012)
Salter, M & Mason, J, Writing Law Dissertations: An Introduction and Guide to the Conduct of Legal Research . (Pearson 2007)