Module POL2098 for 2018/9
- Overview
- Aims and Learning Outcomes
- Module Content
- Indicative Reading List
- Assessment
Undergraduate Module Descriptor
POL2098: What is Law? Jurisprudence from Stone Tablets to Brain Imaging
This module descriptor refers to the 2018/9 academic year.
Module Content
Syllabus Plan
Whilst the module’s precise content may vary from year to year, it is envisaged that the syllabus will cover the following topics in chronological order:
Introduction
Divine and Natural Law
Legal Formalism
Legal Realism
The Concept of Law
Law’s Empire
Jurisprudence and the Brain
Learning and Teaching
This table provides an overview of how your hours of study for this module are allocated:
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | 128 | 0 |
...and this table provides a more detailed breakdown of the hours allocated to various study activities:
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | 22 | 11 x 2 hour seminars |
| Guided Independent Study | 44 | Preparing for Seminar - Reading and Research |
| Guided Independent Study | 84 | Completing assessment tasks - Reading, Research and Writing |
Online Resources
This module has online resources available via ELE (the Exeter Learning Environment).
How this Module is Assessed
In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.
Formative Assessment
A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Socratic Method | 20 minutes | 1-7 | Verbal Comments |
| In class practice exam | 45 minutes | 1-7 | Written feedback |
| Pop quizzes | 10 minutes | 1-7 | Written feedback |
Summative Assessment
A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 50 | 0 |
...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essay | 50 | 2000 words | 1-7 | Written Feedback |
| Examination | 50 | 1.5 hours | 1-7 | Written Feedback |
| 0 | ||||
| 0 | ||||
| 0 | ||||
| 0 |
Re-assessment
Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essay | 2000 word essay | 1-7 | August/September Assessment Period |
| Examination | 1.5 hour examination | 1-7 | August/September assessment period |
Indicative Reading List
This reading list is indicative - i.e. it provides an idea of texts that may be useful to you on this module, but it is not considered to be a confirmed or compulsory reading list for this module.
Basic reading:
Lon Fuller's “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers”
Martin Luther King, Jr., “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.”
Moses, Exodus 19-24
L.W. King “Code of Hammurabi”
Wing-Tsit Chan “The Natural Way of Lao Tzu”
Benjamin Hoff “The Tao of Pooh”
Ernest Weinrib (1988) “Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law”
Karl Llewellyn “A Realistic Jurisprudence – The Next Step”
H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law
Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire
Daniel Dennett Freedom Evolves, Chapters 1 & 2
Jeffery Rosen, “The Brain on the Stand” NY Times
Micheal Gazzaniga and Megan Steven, “Free Will in the 21st Century”
Jonathan Fugelsang and Keven Dunbar “A cognitive neuroscience framework for the understanding of causal reasoning and the law”
Eyal Aharoni et al. (2013) “Neuroprediction of future rearrest”
Iris Vilaresa et al. (2017) Predicting the knowledge–recklessness distinction in the human brain
Morris Hoffman “The neuroeconomic path of the law”
Joshua Greene and Jonathan Cohen “For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything”
Stephen Morse, “New Neuroscience, Old Problems”
Patricia Smith Churchland “A review of The Ethical Brain by Michael Gazzaniga”
Patricia Smith Churchland “Moral Decision-Making and the Brain”
Oliver Goodenough and Kristin Prehn “A neuroscientific approach to normative judgment in law and justice”
Oliver Goodenough “Responsibility and punishment: whose mind? A response”
