Module POL2107 for 2019/0
- Overview
- Aims and Learning Outcomes
- Module Content
- Indicative Reading List
- Assessment
Undergraduate Module Descriptor
POL2107: Gender and Comparative Public Policy
This module descriptor refers to the 2019/0 academic year.
Module Aims
The aims of this module are to introduce you to key concepts and theoretical perspectives in the analysis of gender-related issues in public policy; to enable you to gain a better understanding of contemporary issues and challenges related to gender+ equality and sexual+ equality; and to provide you with the ability to examine the challenges and barriers related to gender in the policy process. The primary context will be Europe.
| On successfully completing the programme you will be able to: | |
|---|---|
| Module-Specific Skills | 1. Demonstrate understanding of significant contemporary debates about religion, politics and policy in post-industrialised society; 2. Critically assess the channels through which religion may be still relevant to understand policy making in the 21th century across a variety of policy sectors. |
| Discipline-Specific Skills | 3. Critically analyse primary and secondary source material and apply theoretical argument; 4. Link concepts and theories to real world examples; 5. Analyse debates and present coherent arguments about gender-related issues in public policy. |
| Personal and Key Skills | 6. Present, evaluate and synthesise ideas and debates; 7. Present written material in a coherent manner; 8. Develop autonomous learning skills, notably self-direction and time management; 9. Contribute productively and co-operatively to class discussions. |
How this Module is Assessed
In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.
Formative Assessment
A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| News-related group presentation | 20 minutes | 1-9 | Oral |
Summative Assessment
A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0 | 0 |
...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender policy case study | 70 | 2,500 words | 1-9 | Written |
| Report from the news-related presentation | 30 | 1,250 words | 1-9 | Written |
Re-assessment
Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender policy case study | Gender policy case study (2,500 words) | 1-9 | August/September re-assessment period |
| Report from the news-related presentation | Report from the news-related presentation (1,250 words) | 1-9 | August/September re-assessment period |
Indicative Reading List
This reading list is indicative - i.e. it provides an idea of texts that may be useful to you on this module, but it is not considered to be a confirmed or compulsory reading list for this module.
G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola and S. L. Weldon (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Htun, M. and S. L. Weldon (2010). “When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 207-216.
Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, Policy and Politics. London: Sage.
Adam, Barry D., Jan Willem Duyvendak and André Krouwel (1999). The Global Emergence of Gay and Lesbian Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Banaszak, L. A. et al. (2003). Women’s Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowen, J. (2007). Why the French Don't Like Headscarves, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burns, G. (2005). The Moral Veto: Framing Contraception, Abortion, and Cultural Pluralism in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
C. Hakim (2004). Key Issues in Women’s Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women’s Employment. Routledge-Cavendish.
Carroll, S. J. (ed.) (2001). The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana.
Childs, S. (2008). Women and British Party Politics. Routledge.
Christoph Knill, Christian Adam, and Steffen Hurka, eds. 2015. On the Road to Permissiveness? Change and Convergence of Moral Regulation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahlerup, Drude (2006). Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York: Routledge.
De Zordo, S., J. Mishtal and L. Anton (2016). A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York: Berghahn.
Engeli, I., C. Green-Pedersen, and L. T. Larsen, eds. (2012). Morality Politics in Western Europe: Parties, Agendas and Policy Choices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Engeli, Isabelle (2009). “The Challenges of Abortion and Assisted Reproductive Technologies Policies in Europe”, Comparative European Politics 7(1): 56-74
Evans, E. (2015). Politics of Third Wave Feminisms Neoliberalism, Intersectionality, and the State in Britain and the US. Palgrave MacMillan.
Fetner, T (2008). How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Grzymala-Busse, A. M. (2015). Nations under God: How churches use moral authority to influence policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hankivsky, Olena (2013). “Gender Mainstreaming: A Five-Country Examination”, Politics & Policy 41(5): 629-55.
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs J. A. 1989. Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women’s Career. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Joppke, C. (2014). Europe and Islam: Alarmists, Victimists, Integration by Law, West EuropeanPolitics 37(6).
Krook, M. L. (2016). Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance », Politics, Groups, and Identities 4(2): 268-83.
Latham, M. (2002) Regulating Reproduction. A Century of Conflict in Britain and France. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lawless, J. (2004). “Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation." Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 81-99.
Lépinard, Eléonore (2013), For Women only? Gender Quotas and Intersectionality in France, Politics & Gender, 9(3), p. 276-298.
Mazur, A. G. (2002). Theorizing Feminist Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paternotte, D. (2015). Global Times, Global Debates? Same-Sex Marriage Worldwide, Social Politics 22(4).
Harvard University Press.
Scott, Joan W. (2005), Parité! Sexual Difference and the Crisis of French Universalism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Sheldon, S. (1997) Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law. London/Chicago: Pluto Press
Wilson, J. C. (2016). The New States of Abortion Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Winter. B. Fundamental Misunderstandings: Issues in Feminist Approach to Islamism, Journal of
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage.
