Module POL3258 for 2021/2
- Overview
- Aims and Learning Outcomes
- Module Content
- Indicative Reading List
- Assessment
Undergraduate Module Descriptor
POL3258: The Politics of Humour
This module descriptor refers to the 2021/2 academic year.
Module Aims
Students taking the module will learn about competing theoretical approaches to the study of laughter and its social functions, learn to analyse written and visual satires from the 18th to the 20th century, study contemporary comedies, and analyse the potential limitations of using ridicule as a political weapon or mode of resistance. In the second term you will get a chance to develop an in-depth case study on a particularly effective (or ineffective) political use of humour drawn from history or the recent past. By the end of the module you will appreciate the importance of humour to the study of politics.
On successfully completing the programme you will be able to: | |
---|---|
Module-Specific Skills | 1. Use different theoretical frameworks to study the various roles played by humour in political life 2. Treat humour as a gateway into understanding the values, beliefs, and power structures of a given society |
Discipline-Specific Skills | 3. Explain the place of laughter in the history of philosophy effectively 4. Analyse humour as a form of political rhetoric |
Personal and Key Skills | 5. Appreciate the role of humour in critical thinking 6. Demonstrate effective communication skills |
Module Content
Syllabus Plan
Whilst the precise content may vary from year to year, it is envisaged that the syllabus will cover all or some of the following topics:
Part 1: Theories of Laughter: Philosophical debate about laughter is as old as philosophy itself. We begin the module by examining the three rival philosophical accounts of why we laugh that have dominated Western opinion on the subject: 1. The Superiority Theory (first proposed by Thomas Hobbes and most recently defended by Henri Bergson), 2. The Incongruity theory (developed first by Francis Hutcheson) and 3. The Relief Theory (most commonly associated with Sigmund Freud).
Part 2: The Social Functions of Humour: With these rival philosophical paradigms in mind we turn next to examining the social and political functions of humour, drawing on the work of thinkers such as Norbert Elias, Slavoj Zizek, and Terry Eagleton. Does the playfulness of humour soften social interactions, or can it fuel social conflict? Does ridicule provide an outlet for emotions that might otherwise lead to violence or does it constitute a form of verbal attack that can itself be violent? If people stop laughing at each other is this, as Zizek said of Yugoslavia on the eve of its collapse, a sign that they will soon start fighting each other instead?
Part 3: The History of Ridicule in the Public Sphere: In this section we turn to history to examine the rise of political satire in Europe with the expansion of print media and the relaxation of censorship in the 18th century. How did the early public sphere in England cope with the growth of satire? How did satirists, playwrights, and authors exploit the new freedom to mock others in front of ever-widening audiences and were they restrained? We conclude this section by looking at some case studies of political humour in African, Asian, and Middle Eastern contexts for comparison and contrast.
Part 4: Understanding Political Humour Today: In the final part of the module we return to the present to ask what, if anything, is unique about the way humour is used for political purposes today. We will analyse the political nature of contemporary comedy through studying the work of stand-up comedians (Stewart Lee, Dave Chapelle, Samantha Bee, Michelle Wolf), internet memes, and late-night comedy shows (Saturday Night Live, Late Night with Seth Myers, the Daily Show, Last Week Tonight). Has the digital age transformed how we use humour politically? Or has it merely provided a new medium for old techniques? Has the manner in which states regulate humorous speech changed and if so, how? Does humour distract citizens and make them bemused rather than indignant when they witness injustice?
Learning and Teaching
This table provides an overview of how your hours of study for this module are allocated:
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
---|---|---|
44 | 256 |
...and this table provides a more detailed breakdown of the hours allocated to various study activities:
Category | Hours of study time | Description |
---|---|---|
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | 44 | 22 x 2 hour seminars |
Guided independent study | 88 | Preparing for seminars; reading and research; watching comedy. |
Guided independent study | 168 | Complete assessment tasks: reading, research and writing |
Online Resources
This module has online resources available via ELE (the Exeter Learning Environment).
How this Module is Assessed
In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.
Formative Assessment
A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Essay plan | 500 words | 1-6 | Written |
Summative Assessment
A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
90 | 0 | 10 |
...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Individual presentation | 10 | 8 minutes | 4 and 6 | Oral in class and then written afterwards |
Essay 1 | 30 | 3000 words | 1-3, 6 | Written |
Essay 2 | 40 | 3000 words | 1-3, 6 | Written |
Critical analysis of a satire or piece of comedy | 20 | 2000 words | 4 and 5 | Written |
Re-assessment
Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Individual presentation | Individual presentation by video | 4 and 6 | August/September reassessment period |
Essays 1 | Essay (3000 words) | 1-3, 6 | August/September reassessment period |
Essays 2 | Essay (3000 words) | 1-3, 6 | August/September reassessment period |
Critical analysis of a satire or piece of comedy | Critical analysis of a satire or piece of comedy | 4 and 5 | August/September reassessment period |