Module LAW3215 for 2022/3
- Overview
- Aims and Learning Outcomes
- Module Content
- Indicative Reading List
- Assessment
Undergraduate Module Descriptor
LAW3215: Cultural Heritage and Digitisation Lab
This module descriptor refers to the 2022/3 academic year.
Module Aims
By the end of this module, you will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of how to work effectively as a researcher, working across legal, ethical and practical issues. You will learn how to communicate and work as part of a team, and manage your time effectively and efficiently. You will also study at least one targeted research topic in-depth.
During the module, you will receive support, training and mentoring from your tutors to address or resolve one scenario-based or clinical-based legal, ethical or practical question. You will be tasked with conducting original independent research. You may be involved in data collection and production via client interviewing, archival research and/or digitisation.
With this module, you will gain experience across multiple disciplines relevant to a particular topic, as well as academic and practical research methods.
On successfully completing the programme you will be able to: | |
---|---|
Module-Specific Skills | 1. Develop methodological research skills, specifically in reading, designing, and conducting experimental research. 2. Demonstrate knowledge of experimental research studies in multiple disciplinaries. |
Discipline-Specific Skills | 3. Exercise informed judgement concerning the practical constraints of conducting research in multiple disciplinaries 4. Exhibit an understanding of the relationship between knowledge and practice. |
Personal and Key Skills | 5. Communicate effectively in a manner appropriate to a professional research environment. 6. Conduct both independent and directed research tasks. 7. Exercise critical judgement in the form of cogent and persuasive writing. |
How this Module is Assessed
In the tables below, you will see reference to 'ILO's. An ILO is an Intended Learning Outcome - see Aims and Learning Outcomes for details of the ILOs for this module.
Formative Assessment
A formative assessment is designed to give you feedback on your understanding of the module content but it will not count towards your mark for the module.
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Client letter | 1,000 words | 1-7 | Written feedback; oral feedback available upon request |
Summative Assessment
A summative assessment counts towards your mark for the module. The table below tells you what percentage of your mark will come from which type of assessment.
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
100 | 0 | 0 |
...and this table provides further details on the summative assessments for this module.
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Report | 100 | 2,000 words | 1-7 | Written feedback; oral feedback available upon request |
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 |
Re-assessment
Re-assessment takes place when the summative assessment has not been completed by the original deadline, and the student has been allowed to refer or defer it to a later date (this only happens following certain criteria and is always subject to exam board approval). For obvious reasons, re-assessments cannot be the same as the original assessment and so these alternatives are set. In cases where the form of assessment is the same, the content will nevertheless be different.
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Report | Report (2,000 words) | 1-7 | August/September re-assessment period |
Indicative Reading List
This reading list is indicative - i.e. it provides an idea of texts that may be useful to you on this module, but it is not considered to be a confirmed or compulsory reading list for this module.
Relevant reading and projects:
- Mathilde Pavis and Andrea Wallace, Response to the Sarr-Savoy Report (2019)
- Mathilde Pavis and Andrea Wallace, Intellectual Property Rights Repatriation (2020)
- Black South West Network, The Intangible Cultural Heritage Project (2020)
- Andrea Wallace and Ronan Deazley, Display At Your Own Risk (2016)
- Michael Weinberg, Thomas Flynn and Neil Stimler, GLAM3D.org (2020)
- Andrea Wallace, Critical Open GLAM (2020)
- Copyright Cortex (2016)
The organisations below are all partners on the GLAM-E Lab and of Exeter Law School. The scenarios, legal questions or clinical work you will perform will be based on their practice and collections.